We’ve Unlocked the Article, “Weber Shandwick Provides PR for Moderna and Pfizer, While Staffing the CDC’s Vaccine Office”
Please subscribe!
3 minute read
Dear Readers,
After consulting with my editor, and in response to numerous requests from reporters in different countries, we’ve decided to unlock last Tuesday’s article. We feel this is in the public interest and important for public health.
This might lose us some paid subscribers, but the article is now free.
Weber Shandwick Provides PR for Moderna and Pfizer, While Staffing the CDC’s Vaccine Office
A potential $50 million contract allows PR firm to be “embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team.”
I’m still not certain what happened to Americans, who seem to have tossed aside all caution and critical thinking when it comes to medical interventions that get labeled “vaccines.” I can only remark that, to myself and many living in Europe, it comes across as rather disturbing at times—almost cultish.
If interested in further reading about the major conflicts of interest and lack of transparency surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines, I won a British Journalism Award for a series of investigations published by The BMJ:
Conflicts of interest among the UK government’s covid-19 advisers Little is known about the interests of the doctors, scientists, and academics on whose advice the UK government relies to manage the pandemic. Attempts to discover more are frequently thwarted, finds Paul D Thacker
How independent were the US and British vaccine advisory committees? Investigation finds disclosure standards differ widely, often leaving the public in the dark
Tracking down John Bell: how the case of the Oxford professor exposes a transparency crisis in government As testing and the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine are hailed as UK pandemic successes, why won’t Oxford University or the government disclose the “long list” of financial interests of a high profile researcher at the centre of both? Paul D Thacker investigates
Oxford’s John Bell is certainly an interesting figure, as he has his fingers in so many pies. Yet Oxford and the British government continue to hide his financial interests and corporate ties. Bell is also a board member of Hakluyt, a British spy firm, with a long shady past. As I wrote a couple weeks back, the Brunswick Group PR firm provides public relations for both Hakluty and British Petroleum (BP), the fossil fuel company which employed Hakluty in the early 2000s to spy on Greenpeace activists.
Finally, you might want to read an investigation I wrote for The BMJ on poor practices inside a contract research company that was putting together the clinical trial for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That article was a finalist for another journalism prize and now has the second highest Altmetric score ever, was rereported in multiple countries across the globe, and was featured in an investigative documentary by UK’s Channel 4 Dispatches.
This investigation really gives you a sense of how sloppy the companies and the FDA have handled these vaccines.
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports
At the bottom of the article, I had to disclose that I had taken the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. This wasn’t my choice; it was just that this was the vaccine that Spain bought, so it’s the one I took.
Despite myself, editors, and BMJ lawyers spending weeks digging through dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails, that were provided by a whistleblower—then sending the investigation out for peer review by experts in clinical trial research—several prominent physicians and public health “experts” in America began tweeting that I was “anti-vaxx” for daring to author such an investigation into Pfizer.
Even though I was vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine … wut?
Seriously, what in the world has happened to people’s brains? If you have any thoughts, please leave them below in the comments.
Paul, your work is far too important for us to worry about paying / not paying because you've made an article free. I will push all your work on my social channels and I'm happy to keep supporting what you do however I can. Thanks
Hi Paul, you should run your Substack the way you want.
Somewhat long comment, but I think it will be worth your time.
You might know that Janine Small from Pfizer recently admitted that the company did not even test to see if the vaccine prevented transmission.
Just look at this idiotic "debunk" from AP News:
"While Roos and many others framed this as a new revelation, Pfizer never claimed that its clinical trial, upon which the vaccine was authorized for use, evaluated the shot’s effect on transmission. In fact, shortly before the vaccine’s release, the company’s CEO emphasized that this was still being evaluated."
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-pfizer-transmission-european-parliament-950413863226
Talk about completely missing the point! The actual question here is - why didn't anyone from Pfizer object when governments claimed that the vax did stop transmission? Wasn't it effectively false advertising? Wasn't it the basis for mandates? Why would anyone mandate a vaccine which was never tested to stop transmission?
However, it probably would have been a new revelation for me if I wasn't using Twitter.
I remember an account on Twitter (JeanRees10) who just kept pointing out in early 2022 that vax was not even TESTED to stop transmission, over and over and over. In fact, I missed the importance of what she was saying the first few times I read it. It just read like a long list of complaints from someone who was not happy with the Pfizer vaccine. But when I saw it like the 25th time I thought "Why does she keep saying the same thing again and again?" :-)
And one day I REALLY understood what she was trying to say. That Pfizer did not even test for what the governments were claiming. I wonder if she felt "How can people not even see this simple thing?" for MONTHS.
Probably you are feeling the same now :-)
To me, it feels like the medical community really dropped the ball on this one. Doctors should have assumed the role of watchdogs, especially given Pfizer's history. There was even a video by Dr Suneel Dhand where he said he only knew a handful of Doctors who had actually read the clinical trial documents when they were first published.
In any case, I think the tide is turning.
Ignore the critics.