10 Comments

The Global Elite

Intend To Reduce

The World's Population

By 90 Percent

To Below 500 Million

By Engineering Pathogens

In the Laboratory

And Unleashing Them

Upon The World

To Depopulate The Planet

And after each artificial

deadly pandemic,

The World will be offered

And even coerced To receive

What will be hailed as the cure

BUT WILL JUST BE MORE HARM

DISGUISED as a LIFE-SAVING VACCINE.

Expand full comment

What's even better is nothing was released. There isn't animal-to-human transfer. So this was just the flu made out to be something. And all fake testing bs numbers. all to vaccinate and kill more people. I have been around people with, and without ever getting sick. All garbage. When I did feel under the weather I downed vitamin C and E and got better. Never to the hospital that is where you will die.

Expand full comment

Keep telling yourself that until you get it. #HermanCainAward

Expand full comment

Fantastic, sickening interview. Thank you

Expand full comment

"This makes the case even more solid that virologists were misleading people by loudly exclaiming that the evidence showed the pandemic started by a natural spillover and a lab leak theory was a “conspiracy.” This was always propaganda to protect their funding and colleagues from scrutiny that this may have been a screw up by scientists. They never had any tangible evidence on their side. "

Pure crackpottery.

Expand full comment

What evidence do you have for natural spillover? None. Your comment is just pure ad hominem.

Expand full comment

Your comment doesn't even make sense. I said nothing about having evidence of a natural spillover. Yours is the ad hominem comment, as is the one I responded to.

Expand full comment

To clarify: There's no *dispositive* (not "tangible"--there's plenty of that) evidence for either *hypothesis* (not "side"), and people like Alina Chan have gone into detail about why that is. I personally lean toward a lab leak, but that's neither here nor there.

Mr. Forrester demands evidence from me for a proposition that I never asserted, while never requiring any evidence for the ad hominem claims about motivation that I quoted. He accuses me of ad hominem, but all I did was characterize a *claim*. Mr. Forrester has been fighting long enough in these trenches (many decades, by my recollection) that he should know by now what an ad hominem is (as well as the nature of evidence, hypotheses vs. "sides", etc. ... but, to get a *little* personal, there's no indication that he ever will.)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 25, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I have removed this comment about Richard Ebright. It's fine to have a freewheeling discussion, but no implied threats of violence.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Aug 14, 2021
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Fixed. Thank you!

Expand full comment