I also obtained a PhD in Microbiology while researching antiviral drugs for influenza and herpes viruses. Unlike her, I questioned the narrative and paid a high price for it: WHO has ordered that my LinkedIn account be terminated in August 2020. I survived longer on Twitter, but when I surpassed 24 K followers, my account was deactivated. You don't need to understand biology to figure out that there is no COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2. Take a look at this this.https://angelovalidiya.substack.com/p/what-is-sars-cov-2-actually/comments?s=w
People like her are a disgrace to science and humanity, but because the media is involved, they are pushed, while people like me work for free for the sake of humanity. Despite censorship and the small social media following, I continue to help others in seeing different perspectives. Your writings, too. By the way, I'm a white woman of Eastern European descent. While working as a scientist at the NIH, I was badly bullied by white western women who would do anything to demonstrate me that I did not belong in their league. Men have never done it to me.
"You don't need to understand biology to figure out that there is no COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2."
Oh dear god. No wonder you got suspended on linkedln and twitter. You are not a scientist. You are a QAnon wackadoodle conspiracy nut case who goes around impersonating a scientist. You didn't work at NIH you fraud.
I could sue you for defamation but isn't worth. If you had any brain you would know that nobody cares about people who write nonsense. LinkedIn and Twitter are full of such. Only the ones who are real danger are banned. All I write is based on science but brainwashed like you who use fake profiles cannot understand it.
I'm not a scientist, but I used to be a lawyer, and a defamation suit based on shit-talking in substack comments would not only fail and waste money, but could backfire. ;)
Interesting. My diaries are contained in stacks and stacks of legal pads.
It's not quite as stream-consciousness as your first entry.
I hope to sit down and type it into substack one of these days. I've called it "inkspread" since at least the 1990s because I use a pen and ink (unlike everything online or at a job, and I've usually had secretaries, but these days it's just me)
LOL You deflected from the fact that I caught you in several lies, including falsely claiming that you worked at NIH and have a PhD, and then hid behind a jumbled pile of ad hominem and wackadoodle assertions and a silly attempt to scare me with a hysterical threat of law suit.
Thanks for proving my point that you are a fraud. If you weren't a fraud, you would have shown us proof by now that you are who you pretend to be. What a total loser internet troll you are. Sorry your not-very-convincing imposter BS didn't work. Get help.
So you found a matching name in Bulgaria "Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences", but failed to notice that there is no PhD with the name? Also, you did NOT find any results connecting such name to NIH, but feel that "This checks out with her comments?" LOL You're hilarious!
Again,
- No PhD
- No NIH history
So, I stand by my accusation that she is a fraud who lied about having a PhD and about having worked at NIH.
Your comprehension skills are a bit lacking. You should learn how to research, and then learn how to comprehend search results. Good luck.
Here she is judging a contest for the International Microorganism Day
"We applaud the effort people put into the contest and thank two of our Journal Social Media Editors for their involvement. Dr Lidiya Angelova for initial ideas and rule drafting, and Maja Rischer for offering a custom made microbe bag as the Grand Prize (left)."
Could you summarize what your point is short of having us download your cards from a separate site? Obviously your title is provocative. You're not saying that covid doesn't exist at all, that it's entirely imaginary?
It is too long to summarized here. It is summarized in the PDF file which you can read without downloading. The data article maybe would be more suitable than the SARS https://genuineprospect.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/covid-data-by-dr-lidiya-angelova.pdf You can decide by yourself. Also I recently stumbled on another video saying interesting things https://t.me/Australians_Against_Vax_Mandates/27711 again read, listen and decide. I worked with viruses, did a lot sequencing and also PCRs. My view is of hands on scientist who wants to help people but in case people don't want to read and understand I can't help.... Truth doesn't matter how slowly will find a way. I am not one of those who deny existence of the viruses btw but SARS-CoV story is fishy since it didn't start with SARS-CoV-2 but SARS-CoV and the author of SARS-CoV is the author of the PCR test.
I stopped reading when I read, "The symptoms of COVID-19 are the same as those of well-known common diseases." This is simply untrue. Silent hypoxia is unique to moderate covid. Also, anosmia is rare in other respiratory diseases, but common to covid. Another unique feature of covid is ground glass opacities in CT scans of lungs.
Covid is spread via upper respiratory infection, but its pathology is primarily endovascular, especially via microthrombi and immunoinflammatory damage.
I'm ignorant and thus agnostic on the origins question, but I've long followed some of those scientists with penises she mentions, and you know what they don't do? Publicly talk shit about other scientists.
Finding that tweet happened rather randomly. I've followed some other women with crazy social media and noticed they eventually make snarky penis comments. I'm thinking specifically of Jen Gunter. So I just decided to search to see if Rasmussen was doing the same. She was.
The thing people like Rasmussen willfully don't get is that circumstantial evidence is evidence, and sometimes very good evidence. People are convicted and sent to prison under the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard based on nothing but circumstantial evidence all the time. Jurors are often instructed something to the effect of: "The law does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence in terms of their weight or value in finding the facts in this case. One is not necessarily more or less valuable than the other."
Discussing circumstantial evidence surrounding matters of public import and forming opinions based on that evidence are totally legitimate activities. Attempts to shut such discussion down as the wild rantings of conspiracy theorist white supremacists are bullshit.
A judge once described circumstantial evidence something like "Five witnesses can say that a dog did not pass by, but I see the fresh tracks in the snow."
And thanks for the link. I had been leaning toward the lab theory on the basis that the lab was right there, and it's the kind of thing people would lie about.
Sadly we live in a world where people do not think for themselves they just except whatever is pushed and marketed. Gullible, naïve and easily manipulated masses
At least they do real journalism and talk about real stuff, unlike Angela Rasputin who has nothing to offer besides substance free childish smears and impersonating an expert which she is not, to seek attention.
But you obviously plug into the right wing fascist propaganda networks, likely on the internet. I bet you listened to Rush Limpdick for decades too, didn't you? Mainlining all that toxic fascist hate propaganda straight into your veins.
I understand THAT millions of people choose to get their “information” from raving lunatics with extensive histories of spreading politically convenient falsehoods and covering up politically inconvenient truths. But I still don’t for the life of me understand WHY
Solid reporting! It’s worth noting that from 2016 to 2020, Dr. Rasmussen worked on deadly viruses w/ DOD's DARPA, DTRA, & Department of Homeland Security, & at NIH's Rocky Mountain Laboratories at the BSL-4 biolab.
Wow! I did not know that. She's "on the team". She's got COI up the yin yang. That explains a lot! MSM should at least disclose her extreme bias when they quote her parroting the party line, but they don't.
DHS published the “National Strategy for Pandemics” in May 2006. It was updated every two years. How could she possibly not know of it? She mocked people for panicking on Feb 20,2002 when they shipped 18tons of our PPE to China on Feb 7.
Dam! I didn't know when my jaw was going to stop dropping. Can you imagine the poor sucker married to her??? Stay tuned for a nasty "lean in" tweet on P. Thacker!
Angie Rasmussen, likely reading every comment here, is no friend to nurses. She’s part of the #IStandWithFauci crowd. If she took the time and paid attention to his negligence she would never stand with him. Unlike her, I’ve worked the front lines when a novel disease was circulating. I participated in pandemic/emergency hospital drills, studied the Six Billion $$$ pandemic preparedness plans. Not just nurses… my family of first responders did, too. They gave up their Sundays with family to host drills. We followed Dr. Fauci‘s plan, that included the precautionary principal. We follow the world health organizations plan that listed respiratory etiquette for novel respiratory diseases which includes masks and ventilation. The world health organization declared the global risk as “HIGH” in February 2020 while she was mocking us. I tweeted her the info and she blocked me. When she, or her family,loved ones and friends are in a hospital, and there’s a shortage of staff she can blame herself for not joining us and supporting us …and instead blocking us. Nurses and HCWs have fled the healthcare system because none of the EXPERTS gaf enough to follow the plans we’ve had in place… since 2005
Sviatogorsk, last major milestone towards Russian southward advance on Slaviansk, abandoned by Ukrainian forces; **HUGE** sea change in last 24 hours in Ukrainian war outlook & propaganda—mood turns negative, resigned to more bad news, no more “rah-rah”; quasi-neocon Edward Luttwak throws in the towel, says Russia will win and Donbass should have a say in its own fate (…..sorry, it’s too late to “hand over” ONLY the Donbass.)
Update has been added to address false claims made against this article by Angela Rasmussen on Twitter. Thanks everyone.
Everyone makes mistakes, but psychopaths refuse to admit their mistakes. Or did Rasmussen admit her mistake?
Yay on the fact that she (or someone at her PR firm) read it!
I also obtained a PhD in Microbiology while researching antiviral drugs for influenza and herpes viruses. Unlike her, I questioned the narrative and paid a high price for it: WHO has ordered that my LinkedIn account be terminated in August 2020. I survived longer on Twitter, but when I surpassed 24 K followers, my account was deactivated. You don't need to understand biology to figure out that there is no COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2. Take a look at this this.https://angelovalidiya.substack.com/p/what-is-sars-cov-2-actually/comments?s=w
People like her are a disgrace to science and humanity, but because the media is involved, they are pushed, while people like me work for free for the sake of humanity. Despite censorship and the small social media following, I continue to help others in seeing different perspectives. Your writings, too. By the way, I'm a white woman of Eastern European descent. While working as a scientist at the NIH, I was badly bullied by white western women who would do anything to demonstrate me that I did not belong in their league. Men have never done it to me.
Thank you for your courage
"You don't need to understand biology to figure out that there is no COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2."
Oh dear god. No wonder you got suspended on linkedln and twitter. You are not a scientist. You are a QAnon wackadoodle conspiracy nut case who goes around impersonating a scientist. You didn't work at NIH you fraud.
When is your next Flat Earth meet up?
I could sue you for defamation but isn't worth. If you had any brain you would know that nobody cares about people who write nonsense. LinkedIn and Twitter are full of such. Only the ones who are real danger are banned. All I write is based on science but brainwashed like you who use fake profiles cannot understand it.
I'm not a scientist, but I used to be a lawyer, and a defamation suit based on shit-talking in substack comments would not only fail and waste money, but could backfire. ;)
Interesting. My diaries are contained in stacks and stacks of legal pads.
It's not quite as stream-consciousness as your first entry.
I hope to sit down and type it into substack one of these days. I've called it "inkspread" since at least the 1990s because I use a pen and ink (unlike everything online or at a job, and I've usually had secretaries, but these days it's just me)
LOL You deflected from the fact that I caught you in several lies, including falsely claiming that you worked at NIH and have a PhD, and then hid behind a jumbled pile of ad hominem and wackadoodle assertions and a silly attempt to scare me with a hysterical threat of law suit.
Thanks for proving my point that you are a fraud. If you weren't a fraud, you would have shown us proof by now that you are who you pretend to be. What a total loser internet troll you are. Sorry your not-very-convincing imposter BS didn't work. Get help.
Here is her name in an article in that field. You are mistaken, unless she is assuming this name and maintaining it for some odd reason.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jobm.200510127
"Proteinase inhibitors from Streptomyces with antiviral activity
Julia Serkedjieva Dr., Lidiya Angelova, Mimi Remichkova, Iskra Ivanova
First published: 30 November 2006
https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200510127
Citations: 2"
Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Department of Microbiology, Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria
Not sure why you think she's lying. It took two minutes to find a venerable credit in her field. It's not a solo paper, either.
This checks out with her comments. You should research first and make accusations later.
So you found a matching name in Bulgaria "Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences", but failed to notice that there is no PhD with the name? Also, you did NOT find any results connecting such name to NIH, but feel that "This checks out with her comments?" LOL You're hilarious!
Again,
- No PhD
- No NIH history
So, I stand by my accusation that she is a fraud who lied about having a PhD and about having worked at NIH.
Your comprehension skills are a bit lacking. You should learn how to research, and then learn how to comprehend search results. Good luck.
LOL. Does that look like the NIH to you? Or a PhD?
Yes, I don't understand such people. Mentally disturbed.
Here she is judging a contest for the International Microorganism Day
"We applaud the effort people put into the contest and thank two of our Journal Social Media Editors for their involvement. Dr Lidiya Angelova for initial ideas and rule drafting, and Maja Rischer for offering a custom made microbe bag as the Grand Prize (left)."
https://fems-microbiology.org/and-the-winners-of-microbeart2019-are/
Yes? And? Still no PhD, and no NIH. Why is this so difficult for you?
Judging an art contest? Seriously?
Here's your NIH PhD: https://www.progress.com/blogs/author/lidiya-angelova
LOL. Project much?
Please cite your published papers and which institution granted you a PhD.
Could you summarize what your point is short of having us download your cards from a separate site? Obviously your title is provocative. You're not saying that covid doesn't exist at all, that it's entirely imaginary?
It is too long to summarized here. It is summarized in the PDF file which you can read without downloading. The data article maybe would be more suitable than the SARS https://genuineprospect.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/covid-data-by-dr-lidiya-angelova.pdf You can decide by yourself. Also I recently stumbled on another video saying interesting things https://t.me/Australians_Against_Vax_Mandates/27711 again read, listen and decide. I worked with viruses, did a lot sequencing and also PCRs. My view is of hands on scientist who wants to help people but in case people don't want to read and understand I can't help.... Truth doesn't matter how slowly will find a way. I am not one of those who deny existence of the viruses btw but SARS-CoV story is fishy since it didn't start with SARS-CoV-2 but SARS-CoV and the author of SARS-CoV is the author of the PCR test.
I stopped reading when I read, "The symptoms of COVID-19 are the same as those of well-known common diseases." This is simply untrue. Silent hypoxia is unique to moderate covid. Also, anosmia is rare in other respiratory diseases, but common to covid. Another unique feature of covid is ground glass opacities in CT scans of lungs.
Covid is spread via upper respiratory infection, but its pathology is primarily endovascular, especially via microthrombi and immunoinflammatory damage.
Here's a summary: complete and utter BS
"read, listen and decide"
Oh, we have.
"People like her are a disgrace to science and humanity"
She is, but so are you. Paul should be ashamed to have liked this nonsense.
Holy shit! What a lunatic! Why would anyone, much less hundreds of thousands of people, listen to this woman’s opinion about anything?
The frightening thing is that there are many more just like her, devouring all of our institutions from the inside.
I'm ignorant and thus agnostic on the origins question, but I've long followed some of those scientists with penises she mentions, and you know what they don't do? Publicly talk shit about other scientists.
Finding that tweet happened rather randomly. I've followed some other women with crazy social media and noticed they eventually make snarky penis comments. I'm thinking specifically of Jen Gunter. So I just decided to search to see if Rasmussen was doing the same. She was.
Must be in some seminar caller document.
This is some of the best mainstream reporting on the origin question: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/the-virus-hunting-nonprofit-at-the-center-of-the-lab-leak-controversy
The thing people like Rasmussen willfully don't get is that circumstantial evidence is evidence, and sometimes very good evidence. People are convicted and sent to prison under the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard based on nothing but circumstantial evidence all the time. Jurors are often instructed something to the effect of: "The law does not distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence in terms of their weight or value in finding the facts in this case. One is not necessarily more or less valuable than the other."
Discussing circumstantial evidence surrounding matters of public import and forming opinions based on that evidence are totally legitimate activities. Attempts to shut such discussion down as the wild rantings of conspiracy theorist white supremacists are bullshit.
A judge once described circumstantial evidence something like "Five witnesses can say that a dog did not pass by, but I see the fresh tracks in the snow."
And thanks for the link. I had been leaning toward the lab theory on the basis that the lab was right there, and it's the kind of thing people would lie about.
Sadly we live in a world where people do not think for themselves they just except whatever is pushed and marketed. Gullible, naïve and easily manipulated masses
Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid are high paid media personalities and you have to ask?
At least they do real journalism and talk about real stuff, unlike Angela Rasputin who has nothing to offer besides substance free childish smears and impersonating an expert which she is not, to seek attention.
"At least they do real journalism"
That is news to me.
In fact, a judge declared that journalism is exactly what Rachel Maddow does not practice: https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/editorial-judge-confirms-what-most-people-know-rachel-maddow-shouldnt-be-taken-seriously-as-a-news-source/
Ahhh, you prefer the Faux News right wing fascist demagoguery reality tv channel masquerading as a "news channel" LOL Gotcha
Well, no, I don't watch any brainless talking heads on teevee, haven't for over 30 years. I'm not a fucking moron, after all.
It's an odd conclusion for a thoughtful person to jump to. I wonder what that means?
But you obviously plug into the right wing fascist propaganda networks, likely on the internet. I bet you listened to Rush Limpdick for decades too, didn't you? Mainlining all that toxic fascist hate propaganda straight into your veins.
Both sides have become a joke. That's the point.
Oh riiiiight. It's the false equivalency narrative.
Russia Russia Russia
Trump? Is that you?
"That is news to me."
It's not; you're just lying.
Stupid misogynist comment that doesn't even get the logic right.
I understand THAT millions of people choose to get their “information” from raving lunatics with extensive histories of spreading politically convenient falsehoods and covering up politically inconvenient truths. But I still don’t for the life of me understand WHY
I recall looking at Twitter origin and she was everywhere, shouting down people asking questions.
- Nobody moves to Canada to be a pipetter in a lab, when they are a successful scientist.
That's a bit harsh, I went back to engineering lab work before the pandemic and it was okay.
Solid reporting! It’s worth noting that from 2016 to 2020, Dr. Rasmussen worked on deadly viruses w/ DOD's DARPA, DTRA, & Department of Homeland Security, & at NIH's Rocky Mountain Laboratories at the BSL-4 biolab.
She worked with or for literally every US Government agency that is hiding the ball and/or redacting COVID-19 origins-related info. 🧐https://mobile.twitter.com/capitolsheila/status/1532373166722539521
Wow! I did not know that. She's "on the team". She's got COI up the yin yang. That explains a lot! MSM should at least disclose her extreme bias when they quote her parroting the party line, but they don't.
How's it going Sheila?
Angie Rasmussen worked with the DHS?????
DHS published the “National Strategy for Pandemics” in May 2006. It was updated every two years. How could she possibly not know of it? She mocked people for panicking on Feb 20,2002 when they shipped 18tons of our PPE to China on Feb 7.
The throughline between Sandberg and Rasmussen is a great observation.
Thanks for the heads up. #PeopleToAvoidLikeThePlague #AngieRasmussen “From girl boss to cry bully.” Perfect. 👏👏👏
Dam! I didn't know when my jaw was going to stop dropping. Can you imagine the poor sucker married to her??? Stay tuned for a nasty "lean in" tweet on P. Thacker!
Always confession through projection. Always.
Angie Rasmussen, likely reading every comment here, is no friend to nurses. She’s part of the #IStandWithFauci crowd. If she took the time and paid attention to his negligence she would never stand with him. Unlike her, I’ve worked the front lines when a novel disease was circulating. I participated in pandemic/emergency hospital drills, studied the Six Billion $$$ pandemic preparedness plans. Not just nurses… my family of first responders did, too. They gave up their Sundays with family to host drills. We followed Dr. Fauci‘s plan, that included the precautionary principal. We follow the world health organizations plan that listed respiratory etiquette for novel respiratory diseases which includes masks and ventilation. The world health organization declared the global risk as “HIGH” in February 2020 while she was mocking us. I tweeted her the info and she blocked me. When she, or her family,loved ones and friends are in a hospital, and there’s a shortage of staff she can blame herself for not joining us and supporting us …and instead blocking us. Nurses and HCWs have fled the healthcare system because none of the EXPERTS gaf enough to follow the plans we’ve had in place… since 2005
speaks volumes about Academia. Filled with people with personality disorders who quickly rise to the top.
Her Kardashian Index score must be off the charts.
Haha
Thanks for the light of truth about our Twatter squatter.
I sometimes am tempt d to post on Twatter but frankly?
¿Who needs that tweet?¿
There are many nasty women with ovaries in this world.
I hope some of the nicer womyn stay off Twatter and don't inject the big Harma hacksxxxine, so we can avoid total depopulation...
Regards from a man. With a penis.
Last time I checked tis still there.
Does Rasmussen feel better if i tuck it twixt me legs?
She is the living, breathing example of empty vessels make the most noise.
Sviatogorsk, last major milestone towards Russian southward advance on Slaviansk, abandoned by Ukrainian forces; **HUGE** sea change in last 24 hours in Ukrainian war outlook & propaganda—mood turns negative, resigned to more bad news, no more “rah-rah”; quasi-neocon Edward Luttwak throws in the towel, says Russia will win and Donbass should have a say in its own fate (…..sorry, it’s too late to “hand over” ONLY the Donbass.)
Dreizinreport --- June 7, 2022 https://thedreizinreport.com/author/dreizinreport/
She’s just another affirmative action failure
No, that's right wing trash talk. You and she have a lot in common.