Everything written here is true. Unfortunately those reading it like myself are well aware of the Orwellian roundabout being continuously spun by Rolling Stone and the other rags acting as journalists.
After watching the just released revelations of the Jan 6 circus which created a false view of insurrection and violence, I’m reminded of the power of propaganda convincing the gullible public again and again to believe in the lies and to never ever question their authority or authenticity. After all by doing so, you might just start to doubt it and actually free your mind.
"Media outlets with strong brands like Rolling Stone . . ."
After retractions (the rag calls them "updates") of their articles on the non-existent gang rape at UVA and Oklahoma hospitals being overrun by patients overdosing on Ivermectin, I wouldn't call Rolling Stone a strong media brand. Their main competition would appear to be Charmin and Cottonelle.
This is an excellent article. The vaccine has been for over two years. We still do not know the severity of the side effects. Yes, we have VAERs, we have anecdotal reports, we have suspicions of the Pfizer trial data. But we don't have the actual numbers and that is enormously frustrating. I know teenage boys who had accelerated heart rates (luckily he seems recovered), I know older people who had significant cardiac issues and needed to have operations. But what I don't know is what the actual numbers are over a large population. It is an enormous failure of democracy and capitalism, that we don't have clear unbiased studies.
That is the biggest problem with frauds like Rolling Stone. They have murdered any hopes of getting to the truth.
I just could never understand people's defensive response to people claiming vaccine injury. I myself ended up with Shingles as a direct result of the vaccine. When I went to my Dermatologist for confirmation, I told him the breakout was a side-affect of the Vaccine. He said "That doesn't really matter at this point"....his tone was very defensive and yes I had Shingles. "Thank you Pfizer" 🤬
"Journalists like Taibbi no longer write for propaganda institutions like Rolling Stone, because they want to keep their integrity."
I think it is more correct to suggest Matt Taibbi no longer writes for Rolling Stone because the magazine is not interested in publishing the kind of reporting on which he (and Rolling Stone, for that matter) built his reputation.
Everything written here is true. Unfortunately those reading it like myself are well aware of the Orwellian roundabout being continuously spun by Rolling Stone and the other rags acting as journalists.
After watching the just released revelations of the Jan 6 circus which created a false view of insurrection and violence, I’m reminded of the power of propaganda convincing the gullible public again and again to believe in the lies and to never ever question their authority or authenticity. After all by doing so, you might just start to doubt it and actually free your mind.
"Media outlets with strong brands like Rolling Stone . . ."
After retractions (the rag calls them "updates") of their articles on the non-existent gang rape at UVA and Oklahoma hospitals being overrun by patients overdosing on Ivermectin, I wouldn't call Rolling Stone a strong media brand. Their main competition would appear to be Charmin and Cottonelle.
I’m not sure if “caved” to political pressure is as accurate as “ready willing and able” to do the bidding of the pharma party.
This is an excellent article. The vaccine has been for over two years. We still do not know the severity of the side effects. Yes, we have VAERs, we have anecdotal reports, we have suspicions of the Pfizer trial data. But we don't have the actual numbers and that is enormously frustrating. I know teenage boys who had accelerated heart rates (luckily he seems recovered), I know older people who had significant cardiac issues and needed to have operations. But what I don't know is what the actual numbers are over a large population. It is an enormous failure of democracy and capitalism, that we don't have clear unbiased studies.
That is the biggest problem with frauds like Rolling Stone. They have murdered any hopes of getting to the truth.
More evidence of poor judgement and low ability spreading throughout many fields, science journalism and even including scientific paper publication.
I just could never understand people's defensive response to people claiming vaccine injury. I myself ended up with Shingles as a direct result of the vaccine. When I went to my Dermatologist for confirmation, I told him the breakout was a side-affect of the Vaccine. He said "That doesn't really matter at this point"....his tone was very defensive and yes I had Shingles. "Thank you Pfizer" 🤬
"Journalists like Taibbi no longer write for propaganda institutions like Rolling Stone, because they want to keep their integrity."
I think it is more correct to suggest Matt Taibbi no longer writes for Rolling Stone because the magazine is not interested in publishing the kind of reporting on which he (and Rolling Stone, for that matter) built his reputation.