As the scientist to first proposed in January 2020 that this damned thing had a lab origin and who published about and was attacked by CCP "scientists" in the peer-reviewed literature and survived the attack, I heartily endorse this article and The DisInformation Chronicle. This article is a must-read. Note the date of their article, Paul. I would love to podcast w/you. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144200/ - James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, IPAK, IPAK-EDU.ORG
When we saw U.S researchers travelling to the Wuhan lab to see what they could learn about the origins of the virus outbreak, but came away empty handed as China wasn’t cooperating and the lab had been “cleaned up.” Was that smoke and mirrors? And why go to the Wuhan lab to get answers anyway when it came from a wet market? It’s all been so confusing. Paul, do you have an idea why the continued cover-up? Is it because it wasn’t zoonotic therefore leaving them responsible? Funding issues and the like. Also, can you define chimeric? Well, they have done a good job with the propaganda. Anybody I mention the lab leak to, accuse me of going along with the conspiracy. I’ve sure had my eyes open to the extent of government control. The story behind this mess, if it ever truly comes out, must be huge. It’s hard to keep things straight when you’re lying.
Kristian Anderson pretty well showed what was going on with his tweet about the Chinese not being able "to do the work", evidently he hadn't read this Chinese study from 2007-
Not only are they capable, they've been at it for years pre-outbreak. And in BSL-2 labs no doubt....run away Kristian, real bad history.
As to Jane Qiu....go through her articles and it's almost painful the level of obfuscation and creative writing. She'd be good at writing fiction novels I would bet.
Honestly it just shows that the level of gullibility is high enough you don't have to demand too much to get effective results with your propaganda. Two words come to mind...lame and pathetic.
As the scientist to first proposed in January 2020 that this damned thing had a lab origin and who published about and was attacked by CCP "scientists" in the peer-reviewed literature and survived the attack, I heartily endorse this article and The DisInformation Chronicle. This article is a must-read. Note the date of their article, Paul. I would love to podcast w/you. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144200/ - James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, IPAK, IPAK-EDU.ORG
Biosecurity State operatives camouflaged by their useful idiots, now exposed--strong work
When we saw U.S researchers travelling to the Wuhan lab to see what they could learn about the origins of the virus outbreak, but came away empty handed as China wasn’t cooperating and the lab had been “cleaned up.” Was that smoke and mirrors? And why go to the Wuhan lab to get answers anyway when it came from a wet market? It’s all been so confusing. Paul, do you have an idea why the continued cover-up? Is it because it wasn’t zoonotic therefore leaving them responsible? Funding issues and the like. Also, can you define chimeric? Well, they have done a good job with the propaganda. Anybody I mention the lab leak to, accuse me of going along with the conspiracy. I’ve sure had my eyes open to the extent of government control. The story behind this mess, if it ever truly comes out, must be huge. It’s hard to keep things straight when you’re lying.
Kristian Anderson pretty well showed what was going on with his tweet about the Chinese not being able "to do the work", evidently he hadn't read this Chinese study from 2007-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2258702/
Not only are they capable, they've been at it for years pre-outbreak. And in BSL-2 labs no doubt....run away Kristian, real bad history.
As to Jane Qiu....go through her articles and it's almost painful the level of obfuscation and creative writing. She'd be good at writing fiction novels I would bet.
Honestly it just shows that the level of gullibility is high enough you don't have to demand too much to get effective results with your propaganda. Two words come to mind...lame and pathetic.
Very grateful for these articles by Paul Thacker. A very fine journalist at the top of his game.
But I spend too much time reading them! Very addictive.