We need more articles on the various, self qualifying, fact checkers collisions and the government's out sourcing censorship. Still the majority of people don't see the connection and even after all this time they don't understand the backdoor totalitarianism that's been enacted.
"Fact checkers." If they were honest, they would call themselves "opinion checkers." They discern which opinions are correct and which ones make you a Nazi.
"And while there’s nothing wrong with Science Feedback posting a contrary prediction, labeling their own opinion a “fact” just proves they fail at logic."
I would argue that it proves that they fail at honesty, not at logic. And they fail deliberately. *Because* they're dishonest.
I'm still not sure why the guy's hiding. A violation of the 1st Amendment is a civil matter, and there's a civil filing in the 9th Circuit. Are they for some reason still trying to drag in uncooperative witnesses at the appellate level?
And do the French police offer that service? Or is there some crime charged in France?
‘ClimateFeedback’ is the sister site to ScienceFeedback, and is similarly biased and thus anti-scientific. It fact-checks and fails all research and reports which question the official narrative that humans are causing climate crisis all by themselves, any which claim that change is also caused by nature, and may be benign rather than dangerous. Unqualified teen activists like Greta Thunberg are never fact checked, but any expert climatologist critical of her fear mongering can expect damnation, no matter how esteemed he once was. Yet this dirty work is done by other highly qualified, apparently sincere experts who volunteer their time and energy to Climate Feedback, united by their certainty of the great threat humans pose to nature and future. For anyone wanting more, I investigated this conundrum a couple of years ago, here:
Media just looks for some strawman to hold in front of themselves. If the government hadn't bankrolled the COVID public relations campaign, we would have seen a more balanced media free for all. But since it is no longer a "free" for all, we were doomed. There is no way anyone can moderate the media for disinformation since only those with deep pockets and an agenda will win. Better to make an honestly free "free for all."
We need more articles on the various, self qualifying, fact checkers collisions and the government's out sourcing censorship. Still the majority of people don't see the connection and even after all this time they don't understand the backdoor totalitarianism that's been enacted.
"Fact checkers." If they were honest, they would call themselves "opinion checkers." They discern which opinions are correct and which ones make you a Nazi.
"And while there’s nothing wrong with Science Feedback posting a contrary prediction, labeling their own opinion a “fact” just proves they fail at logic."
I would argue that it proves that they fail at honesty, not at logic. And they fail deliberately. *Because* they're dishonest.
Canadians, other than truckers, are clueless. Naive, unquestioning, obedient to the core. We only have state sponsored news.
I feel like fact checking his "continue reaching out to conservative news outlets" as his type NEVER go anywhere over than friendly networks.
I hope there is going to be a report in BMJ.
I'm still not sure why the guy's hiding. A violation of the 1st Amendment is a civil matter, and there's a civil filing in the 9th Circuit. Are they for some reason still trying to drag in uncooperative witnesses at the appellate level?
And do the French police offer that service? Or is there some crime charged in France?
‘ClimateFeedback’ is the sister site to ScienceFeedback, and is similarly biased and thus anti-scientific. It fact-checks and fails all research and reports which question the official narrative that humans are causing climate crisis all by themselves, any which claim that change is also caused by nature, and may be benign rather than dangerous. Unqualified teen activists like Greta Thunberg are never fact checked, but any expert climatologist critical of her fear mongering can expect damnation, no matter how esteemed he once was. Yet this dirty work is done by other highly qualified, apparently sincere experts who volunteer their time and energy to Climate Feedback, united by their certainty of the great threat humans pose to nature and future. For anyone wanting more, I investigated this conundrum a couple of years ago, here:
https://medium.com/@nickhunt_41682/how-not-to-become-a-climate-crisis-fear-monger-e6cf65168c21
Who "fact checkers" the fact checkers?
Media just looks for some strawman to hold in front of themselves. If the government hadn't bankrolled the COVID public relations campaign, we would have seen a more balanced media free for all. But since it is no longer a "free" for all, we were doomed. There is no way anyone can moderate the media for disinformation since only those with deep pockets and an agenda will win. Better to make an honestly free "free for all."
RFKjr says they give digital an advantage over face to face with scamdemic masks Lockdowns IsoLa
Digital marketing essentially.
OUTSTANDING --- Mislav Kolakusic -- Croatian Member of European Parliament.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/hr/197438/MISLAV_KOLAKUSIC/home
https://www.facebook.com/sudacmislavkolakusic
Mislav Kolakusic MEP 🇭🇷🇪🇺 (@mislavkolakusic) / Twitter
https://twitter.com/mislavkolakusic
We should compare notes. This organization has members linked to clinical trial shenanigans (David Boulware) and Public Good Projects.