6 Comments
Mar 1Liked by Paul D. Thacker

What I observe is the censorship involved with the vaccine injuries and the origins of the pandemic is one and the same, cut from the same cloth. Groups are working overtime to douse suspicion on both fronts, which I find interesting. Is there a fear of being exposed for breaking the biological weapons convention? Will addressing vaccine injuries lead to unwanted scrutiny of what’s in the shots, which for the most part is secret. Would unearthing the answers connect the two? The only thing I’m certain of is whatever is going on behind the scenes is huge, these Herculean efforts to censor both are conspicuous.

Expand full comment
Mar 1Liked by Paul D. Thacker

Here's Cohens hard hitting Fauci question in an interview on 25 Sept. 2023:

Cohen: "The debate about the origin of the pandemic doesn’t necessarily involve the far right. There are people all over the political spectrum who accuse you of having covered up and lied about your own institution funding gain-of-function research that made bat coronaviruses more dangerous and started the pandemic. [NIAID funded the EcoHealth Alliance, which subcontracted work to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) that some lab-leak proponents contend sparked the pandemic.]"

Fauci: "It’s not only the ring wing, but they use it. And if you look at the facts of that, it’s total fabrication. They jump on, “Oh, he’s the guy that shut the country down and ruined the economy, as well as ruined our children. And he’s the guy that started the epidemic.” The moderates and the progressives look at it and say, “What are they talking about? There’s no way that Fauci is going to be involved in that.”

I had no idea the grant to [EcoHealth and WIV] existed until all this exploded. It’s $121,000-a-year grant and I had a $6 billion portfolio. So when I said to my people, “Tell me what’s going on,” they said, “This is the guidelines and by no definition whatsoever is that gain-of-function of concern.” Now, people are saying maybe those guidelines are a little too loose. My feeling is, absolutely, you should reexamine that, and if you want to change it, change it."

That's it. That's all you're going to get out of him.

I'm not sure I would use the word embarrassing. Pathetic would be more appropriate.

Expand full comment
Mar 1Liked by Paul D. Thacker

Today in Canada making a splash by the opposition party the mystery and firing of two Wuhan researchers from the BSL lab in Winnipeg in 2019. There are 600 pages of internal reports and correspondence prepared after Xi-angguo Qiu and her husband Keding Cheng were escorted out the building by the RCMP. Apparently, they were shipping Ebola and Henipah viruses to Wuhan and trade secrets. I’m sure we’ll hear more.

Expand full comment
Mar 3Liked by Paul D. Thacker

Lol, that response from Cohen is priceless. Clearly you hit a nerve.

Expand full comment