Perhaps we can borrow Jeremy Farrar’s burner phone (which he bragged about using during the pandemic in his book “Spike”) so we can ring the NIH’s chief bioethicist for comment. Who is she married to again? I forget. Oh well, at least these scoundrels aren’t promoted.
Excellent article. Appreciate all the links showing the evidence. Appreciate your persistence, professionalism and integrity. Giving all of these scientists an opportunity to respond to the most basic ethical scientific standard (crediting the actual author) and their continued silence stains their profession even further. What are they thinking? Do they really think this will go away if they bury their heads in the sand?
Personally, I feel sorry for them. The torment they invite on themselves will be in direct proportion of the lies they continue to sustain. May God have mercy on each of us as we find the path to peace.
Thank you Paul. It seems there’s a whole lot of fear going around. Doctors, scientists, researchers are cowed by what they see others go through for speaking against the narrative, whether about the shots or lab leak. Nature must be compromised. How many people are breaking their own standards ethically? This is the most insane period in my life.
Hoe Lee Moly. Isn't there anyone or anything trustworthy? Anyone? Any organization? I can't stand it; I give up. No one can be trusted. T'hell with it all. I'm crawling into a hole and pulling it in after me. The world can go straight to hell.
There seems to be a lot of confusion about Gain of Function which is foundational to EVERY flu vaccine model. Because RNA molecules have such low replication fidelity and will NOT grow in culture DNA clones are made as proxy for viral replication.. the result is a purity that nature will never support kinda like highly enriched uranium vs raw earth minerals.. once released to the wild any GoF clone can ONLY replicate w natural laws for RNA that is low fidelity few replication competent fragments.. virus superpowers are myth from Hollywood biology... RNA molecules cannot pandemic they can barely find RNA genomes to sequence they cobble together pieces.
Scroll through a few hundred pages of 2016 Gryphon Scientific 1,000+ page report for risks & benefits for Gain of Function. Folks don't need to worry about what viral particles may leak from the labs they need to watch what GoF flu vaccines have in them.. there's GoF as a bioweapon!
Until CDC/NIH come clean and make changes you will have a very hard time convincing, those that pay attention anyway, the next virus that comes along. Clean house and start rebuilding your reputation!
The safest course is to assume all science journals are unreliable and require confirmed proof on a case by case basis for acceptance of a single article to be accepted as credible. The problem is money, in general, journalists of all persuedions will now do or say virtually anything that supports their personal situationd. It's a generational problem that can only be repaired one funeral at a time.
Perhaps we can borrow Jeremy Farrar’s burner phone (which he bragged about using during the pandemic in his book “Spike”) so we can ring the NIH’s chief bioethicist for comment. Who is she married to again? I forget. Oh well, at least these scoundrels aren’t promoted.
https://www.who.int/news/item/13-12-2022-world-health-organization-names-sir-jeremy-farrar-as-chief-scientist-dr-amelia-latu-afuhaamango-tuipulotu-as-chief-nursing-officer
Excellent article. Appreciate all the links showing the evidence. Appreciate your persistence, professionalism and integrity. Giving all of these scientists an opportunity to respond to the most basic ethical scientific standard (crediting the actual author) and their continued silence stains their profession even further. What are they thinking? Do they really think this will go away if they bury their heads in the sand?
Personally, I feel sorry for them. The torment they invite on themselves will be in direct proportion of the lies they continue to sustain. May God have mercy on each of us as we find the path to peace.
Keep doing what you're doing. The dominoes are beginning to fall.
Thank you Paul. It seems there’s a whole lot of fear going around. Doctors, scientists, researchers are cowed by what they see others go through for speaking against the narrative, whether about the shots or lab leak. Nature must be compromised. How many people are breaking their own standards ethically? This is the most insane period in my life.
Hoe Lee Moly. Isn't there anyone or anything trustworthy? Anyone? Any organization? I can't stand it; I give up. No one can be trusted. T'hell with it all. I'm crawling into a hole and pulling it in after me. The world can go straight to hell.
No there is not. The saddest discovery of my later years. Schopenhauer had lots to say about this...none of it good.
Perhaps Fauci paid for their silence. It wouldn't be the first time.
Josef Rudolf Mengele school of ethics
There seems to be a lot of confusion about Gain of Function which is foundational to EVERY flu vaccine model. Because RNA molecules have such low replication fidelity and will NOT grow in culture DNA clones are made as proxy for viral replication.. the result is a purity that nature will never support kinda like highly enriched uranium vs raw earth minerals.. once released to the wild any GoF clone can ONLY replicate w natural laws for RNA that is low fidelity few replication competent fragments.. virus superpowers are myth from Hollywood biology... RNA molecules cannot pandemic they can barely find RNA genomes to sequence they cobble together pieces.
Scroll through a few hundred pages of 2016 Gryphon Scientific 1,000+ page report for risks & benefits for Gain of Function. Folks don't need to worry about what viral particles may leak from the labs they need to watch what GoF flu vaccines have in them.. there's GoF as a bioweapon!
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Until CDC/NIH come clean and make changes you will have a very hard time convincing, those that pay attention anyway, the next virus that comes along. Clean house and start rebuilding your reputation!
The safest course is to assume all science journals are unreliable and require confirmed proof on a case by case basis for acceptance of a single article to be accepted as credible. The problem is money, in general, journalists of all persuedions will now do or say virtually anything that supports their personal situationd. It's a generational problem that can only be repaired one funeral at a time.