What did he mean when he said “at no point does anyone question whether dangerous GOF research, which benefits the German healthcare system, should be conducted.” How does GOF benefit healthcare systems?
And what did he mean when he questioned “why aren’t we finding close relatives of sarscov2. Because nobody wants to do the work. They’re afraid of what they might find, says a lot.” Afraid of what pray tell? I thought at the start of the sentence meant because they won’t find a close relative because it was engineered. But when he continued and said they’re afraid of what they might find says a lot. Again does that mean find nothing? Just want clarity. Thank you Paul.
The biggest problem is that reality of biology is missing from all the discussion. There is NO way for RNA molecules to pandemic the GoF are synthetic clones grown in E.coli because replication is only possible in bacteria. These RNA clones may be stuffed into rodents in high purity but that model has NO basis in reality. Their PCR is useless as diagnostic and pandemic is pure illusion. GoF is nothing but pure clones that have NO more ability to pandemic than Cat in the Hat pink snow. As Dr, Jay Couey says using their tests to find their ghosts does not make their ghosts real or make you a ghostbuster. GoF threat is all theater with ZERO biology.
Very grateful that Paul Thacker has exposed this consistent and ideological bias on the part of the mainstream media. Thank you; this article should be disseminted widely.
Thank you for making this excellent interview available. There were whole paragraphs I read more than once because of their importance.
What did he mean when he said “at no point does anyone question whether dangerous GOF research, which benefits the German healthcare system, should be conducted.” How does GOF benefit healthcare systems?
And what did he mean when he questioned “why aren’t we finding close relatives of sarscov2. Because nobody wants to do the work. They’re afraid of what they might find, says a lot.” Afraid of what pray tell? I thought at the start of the sentence meant because they won’t find a close relative because it was engineered. But when he continued and said they’re afraid of what they might find says a lot. Again does that mean find nothing? Just want clarity. Thank you Paul.
I hesitated to read this as I agree we need transparency but if the truth falls in the woods, does anyone hear it?
The biggest problem is that reality of biology is missing from all the discussion. There is NO way for RNA molecules to pandemic the GoF are synthetic clones grown in E.coli because replication is only possible in bacteria. These RNA clones may be stuffed into rodents in high purity but that model has NO basis in reality. Their PCR is useless as diagnostic and pandemic is pure illusion. GoF is nothing but pure clones that have NO more ability to pandemic than Cat in the Hat pink snow. As Dr, Jay Couey says using their tests to find their ghosts does not make their ghosts real or make you a ghostbuster. GoF threat is all theater with ZERO biology.
All the ways they lied about PCR
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N
2016 NIH funded GoF Review.. it's bad models to make vaccines NOT triumph over Nature
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Very grateful that Paul Thacker has exposed this consistent and ideological bias on the part of the mainstream media. Thank you; this article should be disseminted widely.