What an upside down world we live in! I suppose it is primarily a pride thing - holding on til kingdom come to "being right" in choosing a preferred narrative. Crazy. Just crazy.
I wasn’t aware of MIT biologist Kevin Esvelt. He was clear, reasonable and knowledgeable. From this debate, I heard that he believes the virus was released on purpose, which is a whole different kettle of fish. I don’t think a deliberate release is provable but I have entertained the idea. What’s her name looks like she’s been vaccine injured or her nonsensical utterings were written all over her face. Regardless, it was an odd match up.
There is no biology to support RNA molecules to pandemic & there is no epidemiological evidence of any spread in cause of deaths which align with protocol changes along state & country lines Denis Rancourt did analysis of death certificates using date of death & location.
Next myth is Gain of Function is anything more than decades old system of producing CRISPR synthetic clones (because wild virus will NEVER grow to do virology) & transfect the clones into cell culture to grow in E.coli.. the high purity uniform result is how ALL flu vaccines are made. They stuff pure clones up the nose of mice or hamsters then conflate that to what will happen to humans who encounter RNA molecules in the wild.. as different as breathing air that has traffic produced exhaust & being in closed garage sucking the tailpipe.. it is fundamentally flawed model..
NIH funded 2016 GoF Review has details.. search for "however" where it is noted that the petrie dish do not reflect "wild type virus" or human immune systems..
Pandemic potential is psyop decades in the making but not biologically viable reality.
As a former pharmaceutical advertising writer, I’ve seen firsthand how Big Pharma manipulates public perception—not through outright lies but lies of omission. They exaggerate efficacy, downplay safety concerns, and expand diagnostic categories to create new drug markets. However, as Paul Thacker’s piece makes clear, the media and science writers operate similarly. I loved a quote from a Thacker blog in December 2024 where he said that “health misinformation” often means “health information I don’t like”—a brilliant summation of how narratives are shaped to serve agendas rather than truth. Truth is rarely black and white, requiring nuance, debate, and a willingness to grapple with uncertainty. Instead, we see a world where personal agendas, policy preferences, and selective interpretations of data masquerade as science, while dissenting views are dismissed as “misinformation.
Lord these people are shameless
💯
What an upside down world we live in! I suppose it is primarily a pride thing - holding on til kingdom come to "being right" in choosing a preferred narrative. Crazy. Just crazy.
The gulf is growing wider between people on X and people not on X. https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/fault-lines
I wasn’t aware of MIT biologist Kevin Esvelt. He was clear, reasonable and knowledgeable. From this debate, I heard that he believes the virus was released on purpose, which is a whole different kettle of fish. I don’t think a deliberate release is provable but I have entertained the idea. What’s her name looks like she’s been vaccine injured or her nonsensical utterings were written all over her face. Regardless, it was an odd match up.
Gronvall will say anything. She was a fave of Amy Maxmen https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/the-many-fictions-of-nature-magazines
There is no biology to support RNA molecules to pandemic & there is no epidemiological evidence of any spread in cause of deaths which align with protocol changes along state & country lines Denis Rancourt did analysis of death certificates using date of death & location.
Next myth is Gain of Function is anything more than decades old system of producing CRISPR synthetic clones (because wild virus will NEVER grow to do virology) & transfect the clones into cell culture to grow in E.coli.. the high purity uniform result is how ALL flu vaccines are made. They stuff pure clones up the nose of mice or hamsters then conflate that to what will happen to humans who encounter RNA molecules in the wild.. as different as breathing air that has traffic produced exhaust & being in closed garage sucking the tailpipe.. it is fundamentally flawed model..
NIH funded 2016 GoF Review has details.. search for "however" where it is noted that the petrie dish do not reflect "wild type virus" or human immune systems..
Pandemic potential is psyop decades in the making but not biologically viable reality.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
As a former pharmaceutical advertising writer, I’ve seen firsthand how Big Pharma manipulates public perception—not through outright lies but lies of omission. They exaggerate efficacy, downplay safety concerns, and expand diagnostic categories to create new drug markets. However, as Paul Thacker’s piece makes clear, the media and science writers operate similarly. I loved a quote from a Thacker blog in December 2024 where he said that “health misinformation” often means “health information I don’t like”—a brilliant summation of how narratives are shaped to serve agendas rather than truth. Truth is rarely black and white, requiring nuance, debate, and a willingness to grapple with uncertainty. Instead, we see a world where personal agendas, policy preferences, and selective interpretations of data masquerade as science, while dissenting views are dismissed as “misinformation.