I did my research 5 years ago, so I did not read through this whole article. Obviously man made virus. All the gain of function steps where previously published in public journals. All the patents on each step of gain of function have been in the public domain mostly at the European patent office (some at the US patent office). Many experts made this obvious a long time ago. Just had to do the research and follow the evidence. Good to point out the corrupt scientists, institutions and lawyers. thanks for that.
Seriously. I still blame Fauci for this. People cheered his resistance to Trump and rewarded him by proclaiming him a Saint. All he had to do was convince everyone around him it was a "conspiracy" theory, and he did just that.
It appears that all virologists involved with gain of function research or enhancement of virus pathogenicity are serial liars. That must be a requirement for admission to the viral scientific club that has powers to harm humanity.
"For all its scientific potential, gain-of-function research is ultimately a risky gamble"
I'm sorry but what scientific potential does GoF have? The idea seems to be to make viruses more deadly so we can make vaccines or drugs against them. This is utterly retarded as the possible variations of viruses are almost limitless and the chances you'll make a drug or vaccine for a GoF viruses that will work against a naturally mutated virus seems like it would be close enough to zero to be a complete waste of time.
This seems more like arrogant, childish, dorks screwing around in labs just because they can....and grant boards being stupid enough or conflicted enough to give them money to do it.
And experts wonder why we don't trust them anymore......
I'm going to take a wild guess here and say that Drosten will follow the K. Anderson lead and say that his WHO presentation was based on evidence that was later found to be insufficient and that he modified his view based on later information. That's the natural go-to as he could always claim that nobody has seen the WIV lab notebooks so "you know, we can't be certain but 'available evidence' shows me yadda yadda yadda".....
It will be interesting to see a trial transcript if the trial happens......
Germany is going down the censorship rabbit hole which leads to moronic claims by lawyers such as "permissible reporting" or "inappropriate wording". The crazy part is that this law firm probably knows that the courts will likely side with them.
I did my research 5 years ago, so I did not read through this whole article. Obviously man made virus. All the gain of function steps where previously published in public journals. All the patents on each step of gain of function have been in the public domain mostly at the European patent office (some at the US patent office). Many experts made this obvious a long time ago. Just had to do the research and follow the evidence. Good to point out the corrupt scientists, institutions and lawyers. thanks for that.
So the whole world was in on this, yet some people still don't believe the virus was created by human hubris. God help us.
Seriously. I still blame Fauci for this. People cheered his resistance to Trump and rewarded him by proclaiming him a Saint. All he had to do was convince everyone around him it was a "conspiracy" theory, and he did just that.
Circling the wagons, always a revealing move.
Publishing all the questions and all the answers – I'm not holding my breath.
It appears that all virologists involved with gain of function research or enhancement of virus pathogenicity are serial liars. That must be a requirement for admission to the viral scientific club that has powers to harm humanity.
"For all its scientific potential, gain-of-function research is ultimately a risky gamble"
I'm sorry but what scientific potential does GoF have? The idea seems to be to make viruses more deadly so we can make vaccines or drugs against them. This is utterly retarded as the possible variations of viruses are almost limitless and the chances you'll make a drug or vaccine for a GoF viruses that will work against a naturally mutated virus seems like it would be close enough to zero to be a complete waste of time.
This seems more like arrogant, childish, dorks screwing around in labs just because they can....and grant boards being stupid enough or conflicted enough to give them money to do it.
And experts wonder why we don't trust them anymore......
I'm going to take a wild guess here and say that Drosten will follow the K. Anderson lead and say that his WHO presentation was based on evidence that was later found to be insufficient and that he modified his view based on later information. That's the natural go-to as he could always claim that nobody has seen the WIV lab notebooks so "you know, we can't be certain but 'available evidence' shows me yadda yadda yadda".....
It will be interesting to see a trial transcript if the trial happens......
Germany is going down the censorship rabbit hole which leads to moronic claims by lawyers such as "permissible reporting" or "inappropriate wording". The crazy part is that this law firm probably knows that the courts will likely side with them.