13 Comments

Part of the problem is that these were never vaccines but decades old lab tool known as TRANSFECTION and known to be failed therapy in 1999 case of Jesse Gelsinger because human bodies NEVER tolerate foreign proteins. https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html

While spike proteins may make this worse there is no condition where auto-immune damage would not be expected.. but rebranding TRANSFECTION as investigational vaccines takes mop & bucket lab tool and resets IP novel use for cash cow. It was always criminally insane medical experiment on par w lobotomy another Nobel Prize winner decades earlier.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150822064507/https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/gibco-cell-culture-basics/transfection-basics.html

Expand full comment

The many medical issues that will be uncovered may be more earth shattering than the CIA and USAID. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-BCMG198Yc

Expand full comment

Maybe, but it will take the de-sanctification of vaccines for people to be receptive to the idea. This will require undoing decades of propaganda.

Expand full comment

Thank you Paul. I read the paper but didn’t understand much of it because I’m not an immunologist,molecular biologist etc. you’ve broken it down nicely. Hopefully with Yale preprinting this journal (because they know what happened to so many other papers who tried to shine a light on the science), others will emerge. This whole thing is so ridiculous with so many suffering but it’s got to be hidden, buried. Even with pharma behind this push to bury it, why the governments are in lockstep is so upsetting and anger making.

Expand full comment

Rixey is a fraud the author has been duped..

https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/1ea5ffcf-7ca0-4e62-890a-159977e493a6

Expand full comment

Way at the beginning of the vaccine rollout, before the US, it might have been in Israel, there were very early reports of injuries and myocarditis. I remember talking to a friend and predicting that in a few years, the news would be calling all these vaccine injured people "Long-Covid" and here we are.

Expand full comment

It might be in the paper, but it's not clear about the longevity of spike protein in *unvaccinated* people who were infected at some point. It's worth remembering that the "m" in mRNA stands for "modified", not "messenger". A Nobel prize was given to the team who developed pseudouridine instead of uridine to make the vaccine mRNA last longer and churn out more spike. I'm not doubting the existence of Long Covid, but I hope someday they'll figure out the subtleties between Long Covid and vaccine damage from the artificial mRNA.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Thacker. This is a solid share with those who can certainly use this info.

Expand full comment

John Leake has been duped this is untrue. Contrary to claims Charles Rixey did NOT help write one of Bobby's books Rixey was briefly consulting but FIRED for breach of confidentiality contract long before the Wuhan book was written.

Rixey has been busy peddling a theory about DEFUSE proposal that is untrue along w Kevin McCairn who devote much time to derailing biology teaching of Jonathan Couey who is listed as first thanked in the book forward.

Unfortunately Rixey is a liar who is telling untrue stories about RNA molecules ability to pandemic and about doing the job Dr. Couey has done.. Rixey is part of a disinformation campaign that perpetuates the myth that RNA clones can cause a pandemic.

Check out the truth.. anyone with a copy of Bobby's Wuhan book can debunk this lie because Rixey's name is NOT in the book anywhere.. sad propaganda & grifting!!

Here Jay details the truth about the book, the biology & liars doing pharma PR spin!!

https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/1ea5ffcf-7ca0-4e62-890a-159977e493a6

Expand full comment

Oh Dear. John is usually so careful. Thanks for letting me know.

Expand full comment

So has Akiko Iwasaki admitted he's changed his opinion? Please address the conflicts between the study and the comment section. I don't know if the links provided are trustworthy. This research is making my head spin

Expand full comment

No people should not be censored, their opinions should not be labelled 'fakenews' etc. BUT!!! This is a nothingburger.

The technique used to detect spike protein in blood (SPEAR) from that paper has ~10% false positive rate (which corresponds nicely to the incidence seen in that table). The detections are in the fM range which is 1000x lower than most other detection methods. These are likely false positives.

Of course spike protein is harmless, when it is not attached to an active particle. It is the virus and nothing else that makes it harmful.

PVS rates are very very low. so are SeriousAdversereactions.

Look at table 3 in this paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036

Those are TOTAL numbers (1-40) in ~50000 cases. It is really hard to take those numbers seriously.

Expand full comment