Bring in all of the middlemen to testify. Guaranteed that there are more Fauci “personal” Gmail communications out there. Given that he is now protected, and they are not, someone will talk. Not to be too optimistic, but DC jury never would’ve found him guilty for anything. This may actually be a better situation.
Also, when Rand Paul gets him back into testify again, he needs to reframe one main question. Fauci weaseled out by using *his* definition (from the 3PCO framework). From the beginning, Paul should have asked: “Did the NH ever, directly or through intermediaries, fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have made a pathogen more virulent or deadly to humans?”
Bring in all of the middlemen to testify. Guaranteed that there are more Fauci “personal” Gmail communications out there. Given that he is now protected, and they are not, someone will talk. Not to be too optimistic, but DC jury never would’ve found him guilty for anything. This may actually be a better situation.
Also, when Rand Paul gets him back into testify again, he needs to reframe one main question. Fauci weaseled out by using *his* definition (from the 3PCO framework). From the beginning, Paul should have asked: “Did the NH ever, directly or through intermediaries, fund research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that may have made a pathogen more virulent or deadly to humans?”
I read the realclear article. Well done!
Thank you!