“There were limitations on how many references we could fit into the SciAm article,” Ungrin emailed me. If limitations were limited, wouldn't that mean they used only the very best references to prove masks work against viruses? Would hate to see the ones not used.
Oreskes is also big on climate change. I sense a pattern.
I canceled my long standing subscription 2 years ago.
As you pointed out in this article, the real harm comes when we get hit by the next pandemic. Who do we believe?
“There were limitations on how many references we could fit into the SciAm article,” Ungrin emailed me. If limitations were limited, wouldn't that mean they used only the very best references to prove masks work against viruses? Would hate to see the ones not used.
It seems to be quite a pattern in the science world.
Scientific American is the equivalent of a liberal tabloid magazine for academic pseudoscience.
Great work Paul, and nicely presented.